Which benefit does "deconfliction" NOT serve in naval operations?

Deconfliction plays a critical role in naval operations by coordinating activities among various units to ensure that they can operate effectively and without interference. It involves clear communication and situational awareness, which helps to avoid accidental engagements and ensure that resources are used efficiently.

One of the main benefits of deconfliction is avoiding operational redundancies, as it helps to clarify roles and missions among different units. This minimizes the chances of multiple units unknowingly working on the same task or mission, thereby improving overall operational efficiency. Additionally, deconfliction enhances teamwork as it fosters cooperation and clear communication among units, allowing them to work together more effectively towards a common goal. Ensuring units operate safely is also a paramount concern, as deconfliction aids in preventing collisions, miscommunications, and other dangers that could jeopardize personnel and equipment.

Increasing mission duration, however, is not a benefit of deconfliction. In fact, the goal of deconfliction is often to streamline operations, facilitating quicker and more effective mission execution rather than extending the time needed to complete a mission. Therefore, while deconfliction serves many vital functions in naval operations, increasing mission duration is not one of them.